cray·on / [krey-on, -uhn]
–noun
1. a pointed stick or pencil of colored clay, chalk, wax, etc., used for drawing or coloring.
2. a drawing in crayons.
–verb (used with object)
3. to draw or color with a crayon or crayons.
–verb (used without object)
4. to make a drawing with crayons.

When I hear the word crayon, my mind immediately goes to the iconic art supply and the brand I grew up with … the Crayola crayon and its magnificent box of 64 with a built-in sharpener. I remember holding them with little hands, learning how to use the different shades together, and even melting them for cool grade-school art projects.

So this new beverage line has me puzzled. You want me to ‘drink crayons?’ I’ve been taught all my life to keep the markers, paintbrushes and crayons out of mouth, and now there is an imperative to do so?

As a mom, I can appreciate the premise behind the beverage: a drink with no high fructose corn syrup, less sugar and more juice than leading drinks for kids. As a verbal branding associate, I see a great opportunity for a fun, new name that can appeal to kids in its tonality, and to moms in its approach to nutrition.

Using an arbitrary word for a brand can work, if it’s executed well. Apple built its brand off ease and the approachability of something as simple as a piece of fruit. Is Crayons trying a similar approach? Capitalizing on our childhood nostalgia and hoping that translates into a mental shift? That now, it’s ok to ‘drink our crayons?’

As for kids, will this product be confusing in real-life scenarios? “Mom, can I have Crayons with dinner tonight?” Or, “Kate, you can drink these Crayons, but don’t eat those in your art supplies.” For some reason, I can’t reconcile the idea of now consuming or drinking something that has been a part of my life for so long, and used in a very different way. What do you think? Are you ready to ‘drink your crayons?’

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Did you know that Rock Hudson’s character in the 1964 movie Man’s Favorite Sport worked at Abercrombie & Fitch? Did you even know that A&F has been around since 1964?! Well, I didn’t and was surprised to research that it was founded in 1892. But I digress.

I’m talking about product placement. Or “brand integration”. Or blatant advertisments for products that show up during my favorite tv show that in no way seems to be just happenstance. I wonder if A&F’s sales were boosted because of Rock’s employment? Does any product placement actually boost the brand’s sales or is it just a way for the entertainment industry to pay expenses? I cannot speak for all, but I did have a hankering for the peanut buttery, chocolatey goodness that is Reese’s Pieces after watching E.T. Another oldie is Back to the Future 2. Pepsi, Nike & the DeLorean all had call outs throughout the entire movie. What about Castaway? I mean, Wilson was a main character without really being a character! I hear there is a game that Bond enthusiasts play while viewing any James Bond movie where they try to count as many product placement ads as possible; Aston Martin, Rolex, Omega & Coke Zero to name a few.

Music lyrics and videos aren’t immune either. Lady Gaga receives calls from Beyonce on her Virgin Mobile LG Rumor2 in the “Telephone” video. Run DMC didn’t just wear all things Adidas, they weren’t about to trade their Adidas “for no beat up Bally’s” in their song “My Adidas”. And I will never be able to stretch during the 7th inning and not wonder if Jack Norworth got paid to give a shout out to Cracker Jacks when he penned “Take Me Out to the Ballgame” in 1908.

And still more in prime time television! Who hasn’t watched “American Idol” and seen the judges with their ginormous red cups emblazened with the Coke logo? Jack Bauer of “24″ fame drives a Ford Expedition. Who could forget KITT, the sleek Pontiac Trans Am partner to Michael Knight? Even the “good ol’ boy” Duke cousins of Hazzard County, GA drove a custom 1969 Dodge Charger.

Alas, there are lots of examples of artists, movies or t.v. shows that feature product placement but receive no compensation. There was a recent episode of “Modern Family” that was based solely around the search for an Apple iPad. Producers and Apple alike state that no money exchanged hands for the use of the Apple brand. And I’m almost positive Janis Joplin didn’t get a car when she co-wrote and sang “Mercedes Benz”. Correct me if I’m wrong.

Are featured brands getting more business by product placement or are they just sponsors for your favorite movies, t.v. shows, musical artists and video games? Is it brand integration or celebrity endorsement? Would you ever NOT purchase a brand because of its product placement in the entertainment industry? Does it help the overall brand marketing? What other examples have you seen and heard?

Excuse me. I have a call coming in on my Sprint HTC EVO.

Contributed by: Jennifer Rodden

A question Social Media Management Company, Vitrue, raised by creating a Social Page Evaluator, a tool designed to “provide an assessment of a brand’s Facebook Page value and the effectiveness of its social media efforts.” According to Vitrue, Starbuck’s has an annual page value of $20.7 million. The basic calculation starts by assigning a value (a conservative default of $5) to each “like”, but also takes into account the number of posts and the number of interactions. A smaller fan base can earn more than a larger one if the brand uses Facebook to its full potential. Skittles pot of gold, for example, has 1 million fewer connections than beverage giant Coke but is valued higher because of a greater frequency of posts. Can a Brand go too far? Absolutely. With 147 posts in the last month, ESPN has maxed out their page value at $4.8 million. To maximize page value, Vitrue suggests brands post up to twice per day, post photos and videos, and use Facebook tools like the “share” button.

So who do you “like”? What brands have you “shared” recently? Are you doing your part to contribute to the how much your favorite brand is worth?

Contributed by: Allison Jobes

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

AriZona Iced Tea is suffering the consequences of sharing a name with the southwestern state as people upset by Arizona’s new irrigation law boycott the state as well as businesses based there. The ironic thing is that AriZona Beverage Company was founded in 1992 in Brooklyn, New York and maintains all operations in this northeastern state. I suppose the founders may now wish they had put a little more strategy behind their name generation instead of merely taking cues from their home decor.

Contributed by Allison Jobes