It’s a bird … it’s a plane … it’s a car. Actually, it’s two out of three: a plane that transitions into a road-use vehicle. Hence the name: The Transition.

For pilots, simply land at the airport, fold your wings up and drive home.

I appreciate the simplicity of the name selected by the manufacturer, Terrafugia. Appealing to the pain point of pilots who face a dilemma of transportation once they land their aircraft, the name speaks to the benefit of ‘transitioning’ from plane to road vehicle.

The company could have chosen a more unique approach; after all, this is basically the FIRST flying car. Are they leaving open space for future manufacturers to own the category with a more memorable name (think what Swiffer did to the sweeping/mopping category)? I’m not sure. With close to a $300,000 price point, I think they’re pretty safe in the space right now.

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

An article in Thursday’s (3/17, 2011) Wall Street Journal by Jeff Bennett, said Chrysler Group filed suit Tuesday to keep a local group from using “Imported from Detroit” on clothing. They want to stop Moda Group LLC from selling T-shirts and other clothing “branded with the words: Imported From Detroit” in their Pure Detroit store chain. The use of “branded with the words” is an interesting choice of words. A quick trademark search shows the phrase is currently Published for Opposition, or pending a final trademark. The mark is filed in multiple product categories covering everything from key chains to eye glasses. No doubt they plan on using the mark on all kinds of chotchki.

Is something like Imported From Detroit trademarkable? There are all kinds of problems with letting a private firm own a public property like a city’s name. The issue has even boiled over into international legal rights to use product descriptors like Champagne and Parmesan, because they do refer to a specific geographical location. So, is “Imported From Detroit” unique enough to be trademarked? Certainly Made In Detroit would not be. It’s a common usage phrase that is mandatory labeling for many products. But since Imported From Detroit is a turn of words based an import not coming from a foreign country, perhaps it is. It is a phrase that would not come about in ordinary language, unless you’re in another country.

Should Chrysler protect their mark from some little tourist store in Detroit or should they promote its use? Surely, they don’t expect proceeds from Imported From Detroit key chains, hats, and coffee mugs to be a real income machine? By simply allowing its use, they give up ownership, so they’ve got to make the effort. But would they be better off allowing its wide-spread use, as it promotes their products indirectly? You would think so – more awareness they do not have to pay for. Brand building is about building awareness and a set of specific associations. Perhaps the T-shirts are Made In China? Maybe the fashion associations of Chrysler and the Pure Detroit store chain clash. But, free publicity for your brand and your ideas? It seems like a no-brainer. Maybe the real problem was the ad agency seeing the free publicity as a threat to THEIR income stream.

There is no doubt that trademarks are an important part of our world of commerce, especially in an Information Economy where we are competing against low cost labor from other parts of the world. On the other hand, Imported From Detroit seems like something we all should have a right to use, if we have a product made in Detroit. Perhaps that’s a big IF? Regardless, it’s just another example of our ever more branded world.

Contributed by Bill Lippincott, Vice President

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Did you know that Rock Hudson’s character in the 1964 movie Man’s Favorite Sport worked at Abercrombie & Fitch? Did you even know that A&F has been around since 1964?! Well, I didn’t and was surprised to research that it was founded in 1892. But I digress.

I’m talking about product placement. Or “brand integration”. Or blatant advertisments for products that show up during my favorite tv show that in no way seems to be just happenstance. I wonder if A&F’s sales were boosted because of Rock’s employment? Does any product placement actually boost the brand’s sales or is it just a way for the entertainment industry to pay expenses? I cannot speak for all, but I did have a hankering for the peanut buttery, chocolatey goodness that is Reese’s Pieces after watching E.T. Another oldie is Back to the Future 2. Pepsi, Nike & the DeLorean all had call outs throughout the entire movie. What about Castaway? I mean, Wilson was a main character without really being a character! I hear there is a game that Bond enthusiasts play while viewing any James Bond movie where they try to count as many product placement ads as possible; Aston Martin, Rolex, Omega & Coke Zero to name a few.

Music lyrics and videos aren’t immune either. Lady Gaga receives calls from Beyonce on her Virgin Mobile LG Rumor2 in the “Telephone” video. Run DMC didn’t just wear all things Adidas, they weren’t about to trade their Adidas “for no beat up Bally’s” in their song “My Adidas”. And I will never be able to stretch during the 7th inning and not wonder if Jack Norworth got paid to give a shout out to Cracker Jacks when he penned “Take Me Out to the Ballgame” in 1908.

And still more in prime time television! Who hasn’t watched “American Idol” and seen the judges with their ginormous red cups emblazened with the Coke logo? Jack Bauer of “24″ fame drives a Ford Expedition. Who could forget KITT, the sleek Pontiac Trans Am partner to Michael Knight? Even the “good ol’ boy” Duke cousins of Hazzard County, GA drove a custom 1969 Dodge Charger.

Alas, there are lots of examples of artists, movies or t.v. shows that feature product placement but receive no compensation. There was a recent episode of “Modern Family” that was based solely around the search for an Apple iPad. Producers and Apple alike state that no money exchanged hands for the use of the Apple brand. And I’m almost positive Janis Joplin didn’t get a car when she co-wrote and sang “Mercedes Benz”. Correct me if I’m wrong.

Are featured brands getting more business by product placement or are they just sponsors for your favorite movies, t.v. shows, musical artists and video games? Is it brand integration or celebrity endorsement? Would you ever NOT purchase a brand because of its product placement in the entertainment industry? Does it help the overall brand marketing? What other examples have you seen and heard?

Excuse me. I have a call coming in on my Sprint HTC EVO.

Contributed by: Jennifer Rodden

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
We’ve all heard about the hundreds of Toyota cars that have been recalled due to sticking accelerators and the pedal entrapment issues (or the “big boo boo”). While Toyota has to gone to great measures to fix these issues, an even bigger question remains. Will the Toyota brand survive this tremendous hit and how have they responded to this crisis? This is a touchy topic, for many reasons. How do you put trust back into a brand that’s caused so many tragedies by way of a seemingly easily fixable flaw? Continue Reading »